Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-Arizona) is not the yas-queen-bisexual-girlboss icon we originally thought. His first political days after September 11 as a Green Party spokesperson and organizer of anti-war protests are long gone, and her recent obstructionism against the Build Back Better framework has cemented her position as a centrist Democrat.
Sinema’s ever-evolving style, which includes wearing a denim jacket preside over the Senate on Tuesday, sporting a bright pink shirt reading “DANGEROUS CREATURE” in February or wearing an infamous pink wig and red glasses, among other fashion choices, have received many headlines and been the subject of too many jokes on Twitter.
But honestly it doesn’t matter what Sinema wears when she rejects what some call once in a lifetime reform opportunities?
What are these recent reform opportunities?
The Rebuild a better framework is a plan to raise taxes for the richest and largest corporations to create jobs, lower taxes and lower childcare costs, according to the White House government website.
Both bills include the bipartisan $ 1,000 billion infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better Act of up to $ 3.5 trillion over 10 years.
The bill is being challenged by Republicans, and through a budget process called reconciliation, the Democrats are trying to apply it. The Build Back Better Act includes two free years of community college, universal child care and preschool, health insurance, and lower prescription drug prices.
These are unprecedented reforms that could change the way our country works.
It also marks a new chance for climate action. The Build Back Better Act “would transform the electricity sector so that it operates mainly on clean energy, orient the transport sector towards electric vehicles and finally act against pollution from methane, one of the greenhouse gases. most harmful greenhouse ”, according to Vox.
Besides fashion, why is Sinema making the headlines?
Sinema was the first openly bisexual female senator, Arizona’s first female senator, and toppled the vacant seat of her retired predecessor, becoming Arizona’s first Democrat. elected since 1988.
During her run, she moved away from her left-wing days to adopt a political brand that focused on her 3 years of homelessness as a child and closely aligned with Senator Joe Manchin (DW.Va.), a centrist Democrat from West Virginia.
Now his policies are costing Democrats reform that could change the lives of millions of Americans and the world community, considering America to be the largest producer of carbon pollution.
She has been a hindrance for Democrats and has specifically opposed corporate and income tax increases that would help fund the $ 3.5 trillion bill. Every vote counts in a divided Senate, and its continued turmoil prevents progress.
Most recently, five Sinema veterans and advisers publicly accused her to “hang (his) constituents to dry off” and quit their roles.
Sinema’s centrism has not only focused on issues related to President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s bill On March 5, the Senate passed a motion to include an invoice that would raise the minimum wage to $ 15 an hour by 2025. Sinema joined Republicans and six other Democrats in voting against the Raise the Wage law of 2021 on a 58-42 vote.
Sinema said in a declaration that an open debate on increasing the federal minimum wage should be separated from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) bill. But she didn’t just say no – she strutted across the Senate floor and made a sort of curtsy, like weighed down by the downcast thumb she exaggerated. This refusal would be the subject of many memes and speeches on political sexism.
But again: whether Sinema gave a thumbs-down nod, a simple nod, or a ridiculous cartwheel, the point is, she rejected the possibility of millions of Americans earning more wages. students. More than 800,000 of his own voters would have been affected by the increase, according to Huffington Post.
How does the public react to Sinema’s centrism?
Beginning of October, immigration activists followed Sinema into a bathroom at Arizona State University of the Living United for Change in Arizona organization, or LUCHA, after trying to talk to her as she walked out of a classroom of the University. They demanded that she “support the bill” after saying they helped her get her elected.
The militant group tweeted that Sinema was “completely inaccessible” and therefore had to “resort to confrontation” with Sinema.
Sinema sentenced the actions of the demonstrators, describing their actions as “inappropriate”. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) Did not support a joint statement disapproving of protesters’ actions against Sinema, “because that would also not include a rebuke of his political views” such as Sinema’s opposition prescription drug reform, according to Axes.
According to Vogue teens, the phone bank organization page read, “Hey girls, gays and them. We are recruiting for Hot Bisexuals Against Kyrsten Sinema. Handcuff your jeans, grab your iced coffee, grab your SSRI and sit sideways in your chair… We need to let Sinema know that the performance isn’t colorful wigs and great eyeliner. Gay people want it all: good jobs, investment in infrastructure, citizenship for all and a chance to SURVIVE.
Most recently, one of Sinema’s voters asked him in an airport why she “met dozens of lobbyists” and not voters. Sinema completely ignored the person asking the questions and continued to speak to Republican Senator Tim Scott (RS.C.), tentatively apologizing for the inconvenience caused to a concerned citizen. “Your constituents are hurting, what are you going to do about climate change? “
It’s not dramatic, but the livelihoods of millions and even billions of people currently rest on Sinema’s shoulders. It’s important to keep talking about her obstructionism, supporting those who try to reach her, and literally discussing everything about her actions instead of her clothes.